Join our conversation!
« Gary Johnson wants in the presidential debates | Main | Stage set for Romney visit to Richmond »
10/11/2012
Comments
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Verify your Comment
Previewing your Comment
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
ABOUT DECISION VIRGINIA
Search
Categories
- 2012 Presidential Election
- 2016 Presidential Election
- Ann Romney
- Attorney General's Office
- Barack Obama
- Bill Bolling
- Bob McDonnell
- Buying A Voice
- Celebrity Visits
- Corey Stewart
- Decision Virginia 2010
- Decision Virginia 2012
- Decision Virginia 2013
- Dick Saslaw
- Donald McEachin
- Dorothy McAuliffe
- Doug Wilder
- Dwight Jones
- E.W. Jackson
- Eric Cantor
- Gary Johnson
- George Allen
- Hillary Clinton
- Inauguration
- Jim Moran
- Joe Biden
- John Watkins
- Ken Cuccinelli
- Kirk Cox
- Larry Sabato
- Mark Obenshain
- Mark Warner
- Maureen McDonnell
- McDonnell Administration
- Michelle Obama
- Mitt Romney
- Obama Administration
- Patrick Moran
- Paul Ryan
- Pete Snyder
- Republican National Convention
- Republican Party of Virginia Convention
- Richmond City Politics
- Scott Rigell
- Susan Stimpson
- Tareq Salahi
- Terry McAuliffe
- The State of the Race
- Tim Kaine
- VA 2012 Congressional Races
- VA 2012 Senate Race
- VA 2013 General Assembly Session
- VA 2013 Gubernatorial Race
- VA 2013 Lt. Governor's Race
- VA Attorney General Race
- VA Congressional Delegation
- VA Lt. Governor's Race
- Virginia Visits
- Wayne Powell
Iam curious as to how the moderators are chosen..
Posted by: Linda | 10/11/2012 at 09:18 PM
NO MORE SPENDING LIMIT INCREASE!!! To much spiendng is what got us into this mess. More spiendng will not solve anything!!Ron Paul 2012, a change for America's Interest NOT Special Interest!!!
Posted by: Gary | 11/06/2012 at 01:12 AM
in an earlier mesasge, Google opened this blog by emphasising that it is "a multinational corporation" and that it wants to provide "a resource for policymakers around the world". Those are it's words - not mine. So if it wants this to be an international blog, then it should have international items.This isn't a case of getting my "political fix for [my] region" - it's a case of what are Google's international policies. If this were a blog about Google's U.S. policies, then your point would be well made - but as it says it is about international policies, then that's what I'm asking for.Yes it may be "skewed towards the American political system" - but that's still different from being (almost) exclusively about the American political system.Freeman
Posted by: Vandana | 11/06/2012 at 03:10 AM
Yet ANOTHER purely U.S. aitrcle (see my comment on the previous aitrcle).Is this meant to be a blog on Google U.S. policy, or on international policy?That's just the nature of the internet - it's still heavily US biased. Nearly every site one goes defaults to a US time zone.I actually find it more irritating going to another country and having Google auto-select a localised site when I have specifically typed in Google.com. If I wanted Google.ae, I would type that. Given that Arabic is a minority language in the UAE, it is crazy that Google keeps defaulting to that even when users type in the American/international address.
Posted by: Nischal | 11/08/2012 at 12:36 AM